![does topaz denoise 6 cancel out denoise 5 does topaz denoise 6 cancel out denoise 5](https://i3.ytimg.com/vi/gh7-cP3WbM0/hqdefault.jpg)
I even made one myself that looks better than those, but it too looked like crap, so I scrapped that project.Īs a reader, I'd much rather have speckled scans than those where every single tone is smeared, and where there are halos around every edge. Do you mind the use of such filters? are you even aware of it? If you're also a part of scanlation, then do you use it? If you don't, what do you think of others who do? etc.ĭenoising of mag scans looks like ass at least 75% of the time, regardless of plugin/program used. They can come out looking blurred or blotchy and hurt the overall quality of the scanlation.Īfter having said all that, I was wondering what other people felt/thought about this. However, in the case of manga that do use toner, the over use of denoise filters can be more destructive than beneficial. Sure it can make a manga seem smoother looking and not be too much of an issue on manga that don't use toner. I've noticed this being done especially on lower scan quality raws. A lot of the time groups clean their manga using different types of denoise filters to remove dust, make it less pixelated, and to save time. One of these things is the use of photoshop's denoise abilities. I got into scanlation after reading manga for several years(mostly online readers).Īfter having participated in the process of producing scanlations and working with a few groups, I've noticed differences in the way other people clean/edit manga. Sometimes the pages come precleaned(cropped, leveled, rotated, etc) and some times I do it myself when I just get the raws. I've been doing redraws for manga for a while and have worked long term on a few series.